Noisy Student Training extends the idea of self-training and distillation with the use of equal-or-larger student models and noise added to the student during learning. 27.8 to 16.1. Notice, Smithsonian Terms of Image Classification Noisy Student can still improve the accuracy to 1.6%. Finally, the training time of EfficientNet-L2 is around 2.72 times the training time of EfficientNet-L1. We evaluate the best model, that achieves 87.4% top-1 accuracy, on three robustness test sets: ImageNet-A, ImageNet-C and ImageNet-P. ImageNet-C and P test sets[24] include images with common corruptions and perturbations such as blurring, fogging, rotation and scaling. Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classification. Although noise may appear to be limited and uninteresting, when it is applied to unlabeled data, it has a compound benefit of enforcing local smoothness in the decision function on both labeled and unlabeled data. We evaluate our EfficientNet-L2 models with and without Noisy Student against an FGSM attack. on ImageNet ReaL The proposed use of distillation to only handle easy instances allows for a more aggressive trade-off in the student size, thereby reducing the amortized cost of inference and achieving better accuracy than standard distillation. About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features Press Copyright Contact us Creators . Then we finetune the model with a larger resolution for 1.5 epochs on unaugmented labeled images. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.04252, Accompanying notebook and sources to "A Guide to Pseudolabelling: How to get a Kaggle medal with only one model" (Dec. 2020 PyData Boston-Cambridge Keynote), Deep learning has shown remarkable successes in image recognition in recent years[35, 66, 62, 23, 69]. Noisy Student Training is based on the self-training framework and trained with 4 simple steps: For ImageNet checkpoints trained by Noisy Student Training, please refer to the EfficientNet github. Next, a larger student model is trained on the combination of all data and achieves better performance than the teacher by itself.OUTLINE:0:00 - Intro \u0026 Overview1:05 - Semi-Supervised \u0026 Transfer Learning5:45 - Self-Training \u0026 Knowledge Distillation10:00 - Noisy Student Algorithm Overview20:20 - Noise Methods22:30 - Dataset Balancing25:20 - Results30:15 - Perturbation Robustness34:35 - Ablation Studies39:30 - Conclusion \u0026 CommentsPaper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.04252Code: https://github.com/google-research/noisystudentModels: https://github.com/tensorflow/tpu/tree/master/models/official/efficientnetAbstract:We present Noisy Student Training, a semi-supervised learning approach that works well even when labeled data is abundant. Since a teacher models confidence on an image can be a good indicator of whether it is an out-of-domain image, we consider the high-confidence images as in-domain images and the low-confidence images as out-of-domain images. During the generation of the pseudo Please refer to [24] for details about mCE and AlexNets error rate. The architectures for the student and teacher models can be the same or different. Self-training 1 2Self-training 3 4n What is Noisy Student? This result is also a new state-of-the-art and 1% better than the previous best method that used an order of magnitude more weakly labeled data [ 44, 71]. On ImageNet, we first train an EfficientNet model on labeled images and use it as a teacher to generate pseudo labels for 300M unlabeled images. In our experiments, we use dropout[63], stochastic depth[29], data augmentation[14] to noise the student. As shown in Table3,4 and5, when compared with the previous state-of-the-art model ResNeXt-101 WSL[44, 48] trained on 3.5B weakly labeled images, Noisy Student yields substantial gains on robustness datasets. mFR (mean flip rate) is the weighted average of flip probability on different perturbations, with AlexNets flip probability as a baseline. It is found that training and scaling strategies may matter more than architectural changes, and further, that the resulting ResNets match recent state-of-the-art models. Finally, we iterate the process by putting back the student as a teacher to generate new pseudo labels and train a new student. ImageNet images and use it as a teacher to generate pseudo labels on 300M Learn more. on ImageNet ReaL. A self-training method that better adapt to the popular two stage training pattern for multi-label text classification under a semi-supervised scenario by continuously finetuning the semantic space toward increasing high-confidence predictions, intending to further promote the performance on target tasks. This work adopts the noisy-student learning method, and adopts 3D nnUNet as the segmentation model during the experiments, since No new U-Net is the state-of-the-art medical image segmentation method and designs task-specific pipelines for different tasks. Lastly, we trained another EfficientNet-L2 student by using the EfficientNet-L2 model as the teacher. Hence, EfficientNet-L0 has around the same training speed with EfficientNet-B7 but more parameters that give it a larger capacity. To achieve strong results on ImageNet, the student model also needs to be large, typically larger than common vision models, so that it can leverage a large number of unlabeled images. We find that using a batch size of 512, 1024, and 2048 leads to the same performance. For instance, on ImageNet-A, Noisy Student achieves 74.2% top-1 accuracy which is approximately 57% more accurate than the previous state-of-the-art model. We duplicate images in classes where there are not enough images. The pseudo labels can be soft (a continuous distribution) or hard (a one-hot distribution). task. over the JFT dataset to predict a label for each image. But during the learning of the student, we inject noise such as data Their main goal is to find a small and fast model for deployment. There was a problem preparing your codespace, please try again. Models are available at https://github.com/tensorflow/tpu/tree/master/models/official/efficientnet. The main difference between our work and prior works is that we identify the importance of noise, and aggressively inject noise to make the student better. The learning rate starts at 0.128 for labeled batch size 2048 and decays by 0.97 every 2.4 epochs if trained for 350 epochs or every 4.8 epochs if trained for 700 epochs. To date (2020) we will introduce "Noisy Student Training", which is a state-of-the-art model.The idea is to extend self-training and Distillation, a paper that shows that by adding three noises and distilling multiple times, the student model will have better generalization performance than the teacher model. In particular, we first perform normal training with a smaller resolution for 350 epochs. When the student model is deliberately noised it is actually trained to be consistent to the more powerful teacher model that is not noised when it generates pseudo labels. Semi-supervised medical image classification with relation-driven self-ensembling model. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art in both the field of CNNs for image classification and object detection and Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs) in a synergetic way including a comprehensive trade-off analysis from a human-machine perspective. We present Noisy Student Training, a semi-supervised learning approach that works well even when labeled data is abundant. Especially unlabeled images are plentiful and can be collected with ease. For smaller models, we set the batch size of unlabeled images to be the same as the batch size of labeled images. We then train a larger EfficientNet as a student model on the combination of labeled and pseudo labeled images. . Works based on pseudo label[37, 31, 60, 1] are similar to self-training, but also suffers the same problem with consistency training, since it relies on a model being trained instead of a converged model with high accuracy to generate pseudo labels. We verify that this is not the case when we use 130M unlabeled images since the model does not overfit the unlabeled set from the training loss. Since we use soft pseudo labels generated from the teacher model, when the student is trained to be exactly the same as the teacher model, the cross entropy loss on unlabeled data would be zero and the training signal would vanish. Significantly, after using the masks generated by student-SN, the classification performance improved by 0.9 of AC, 0.7 of SE, and 0.9 of AUC. Specifically, we train the student model for 350 epochs for models larger than EfficientNet-B4, including EfficientNet-L0, L1 and L2 and train the student model for 700 epochs for smaller models. Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. . On ImageNet-P, it leads to an mean flip rate (mFR) of 17.8 if we use a resolution of 224x224 (direct comparison) and 16.1 if we use a resolution of 299x299.111For EfficientNet-L2, we use the model without finetuning with a larger test time resolution, since a larger resolution results in a discrepancy with the resolution of data and leads to degraded performance on ImageNet-C and ImageNet-P. Z. Yalniz, H. Jegou, K. Chen, M. Paluri, and D. Mahajan, Billion-scale semi-supervised learning for image classification, Z. Yang, W. W. Cohen, and R. Salakhutdinov, Revisiting semi-supervised learning with graph embeddings, Z. Yang, J. Hu, R. Salakhutdinov, and W. W. Cohen, Semi-supervised qa with generative domain-adaptive nets, Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods, 33rd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, R. Zhai, T. Cai, D. He, C. Dan, K. He, J. Hopcroft, and L. Wang, Adversarially robust generalization just requires more unlabeled data, X. Zhai, A. Oliver, A. Kolesnikov, and L. Beyer, Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, Making convolutional networks shift-invariant again, X. Zhang, Z. Li, C. Change Loy, and D. Lin, Polynet: a pursuit of structural diversity in very deep networks, X. Zhu, Z. Ghahramani, and J. D. Lafferty, Semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions, Proceedings of the 20th International conference on Machine learning (ICML-03), Semi-supervised learning literature survey, University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Computer Sciences, B. Zoph, V. Vasudevan, J. Shlens, and Q. V. Le, Learning transferable architectures for scalable image recognition, Architecture specifications for EfficientNet used in the paper. Train a classifier on labeled data (teacher). For example, without Noisy Student, the model predicts bullfrog for the image shown on the left of the second row, which might be resulted from the black lotus leaf on the water. C. Szegedy, S. Ioffe, V. Vanhoucke, and A. (or is it just me), Smithsonian Privacy For each class, we select at most 130K images that have the highest confidence. We use our best model Noisy Student with EfficientNet-L2 to teach student models with sizes ranging from EfficientNet-B0 to EfficientNet-B7. Finally, we iterate the algorithm a few times by treating the student as a teacher to generate new pseudo labels and train a new student. We found that self-training is a simple and effective algorithm to leverage unlabeled data at scale. The mapping from the 200 classes to the original ImageNet classes are available online.222https://github.com/hendrycks/natural-adv-examples/blob/master/eval.py. Self-Training With Noisy Student Improves ImageNet Classification Abstract: We present a simple self-training method that achieves 88.4% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, which is 2.0% better than the state-of-the-art model that requires 3.5B weakly labeled Instagram images. If nothing happens, download Xcode and try again. This is why "Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classification" written by Qizhe Xie et al makes me very happy. Using Noisy Student (EfficientNet-L2) as the teacher leads to another 0.8% improvement on top of the improved results. Self-training with noisy student improves imagenet classification. First, a teacher model is trained in a supervised fashion. Although the images in the dataset have labels, we ignore the labels and treat them as unlabeled data. This article demonstrates the first tool based on a convolutional Unet++ encoderdecoder architecture for the semantic segmentation of in vitro angiogenesis simulation images followed by the resulting mask postprocessing for data analysis by experts. Noisy Students performance improves with more unlabeled data. A novel random matrix theory based damping learner for second order optimisers inspired by linear shrinkage estimation is developed, and it is demonstrated that the derived method works well with adaptive gradient methods such as Adam. As can be seen from Table 8, the performance stays similar when we reduce the data to 116 of the total data, which amounts to 8.1M images after duplicating. Next, with the EfficientNet-L0 as the teacher, we trained a student model EfficientNet-L1, a wider model than L0. Most existing distance metric learning approaches use fully labeled data Self-training achieves enormous success in various semi-supervised and Please Le. Use a model to predict pseudo-labels on the filtered data: This is not an officially supported Google product. Stochastic Depth is a simple yet ingenious idea to add noise to the model by bypassing the transformations through skip connections. Amongst other components, Noisy Student implements Self-Training in the context of Semi-Supervised Learning. Test images on ImageNet-P underwent different scales of perturbations. The top-1 accuracy reported in this paper is the average accuracy for all images included in ImageNet-P. By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our. Med. In all previous experiments, the students capacity is as large as or larger than the capacity of the teacher model. Noisy Student Training is a semi-supervised training method which achieves 88.4% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet and surprising gains on robustness and adversarial benchmarks. To achieve this result, we first train an EfficientNet model on labeled First, it makes the student larger than, or at least equal to, the teacher so the student can better learn from a larger dataset. Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classification. As can be seen from the figure, our model with Noisy Student makes correct predictions for images under severe corruptions and perturbations such as snow, motion blur and fog, while the model without Noisy Student suffers greatly under these conditions. Noisy student-teacher training for robust keyword spotting, Unsupervised Self-training Algorithm Based on Deep Learning for Optical On robustness test sets, it improves ImageNet-A top-1 accuracy from 61.0% to . We use EfficientNet-B4 as both the teacher and the student. We present Noisy Student Training, a semi-supervised learning approach that works well even when labeled data is abundant. Our work is based on self-training (e.g.,[59, 79, 56]). Noisy Student Training is a semi-supervised learning method which achieves 88.4% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet (SOTA) and surprising gains on robustness and adversarial benchmarks. If you get a better model, you can use the model to predict pseudo-labels on the filtered data. Learn more. Noisy Student improves adversarial robustness against an FGSM attack though the model is not optimized for adversarial robustness. Yalniz et al. The most interesting image is shown on the right of the first row. We then train a larger EfficientNet as a student model on the combination of labeled and pseudo labeled images. Although they have produced promising results, in our preliminary experiments, consistency regularization works less well on ImageNet because consistency regularization in the early phase of ImageNet training regularizes the model towards high entropy predictions, and prevents it from achieving good accuracy. During the learning of the student, we inject noise such as dropout, stochastic depth, and data augmentation via RandAugment to the student so that the student generalizes better than the teacher. The performance consistently drops with noise function removed. We use the standard augmentation instead of RandAugment in this experiment. Self-Training With Noisy Student Improves ImageNet Classification Qizhe Xie, Minh-Thang Luong, Eduard Hovy, Quoc V. Le; Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. Models are available at https://github.com/tensorflow/tpu/tree/master/models/official/efficientnet. These significant gains in robustness in ImageNet-C and ImageNet-P are surprising because our models were not deliberately optimizing for robustness (e.g., via data augmentation). The width. [76] also proposed to first only train on unlabeled images and then finetune their model on labeled images as the final stage. The model with Noisy Student can successfully predict the correct labels of these highly difficult images. This work introduces two challenging datasets that reliably cause machine learning model performance to substantially degrade and curates an adversarial out-of-distribution detection dataset called IMAGENET-O, which is the first out- of-dist distribution detection dataset created for ImageNet models. Our experiments show that an important element for this simple method to work well at scale is that the student model should be noised during its training while the teacher should not be noised during the generation of pseudo labels. Zoph et al. In our experiments, we observe that soft pseudo labels are usually more stable and lead to faster convergence, especially when the teacher model has low accuracy. For simplicity, we experiment with using 1128,164,132,116,14 of the whole data by uniformly sampling images from the the unlabeled set though taking the images with highest confidence leads to better results. The abundance of data on the internet is vast. Code is available at https://github.com/google-research/noisystudent. Agreement NNX16AC86A, Is ADS down? Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. Scripts used for our ImageNet experiments: Similar scripts to run predictions on unlabeled data, filter and balance data and train using the filtered data. We find that Noisy Student is better with an additional trick: data balancing. On, International journal of molecular sciences. Infer labels on a much larger unlabeled dataset. Self-Training achieved the state-of-the-art in ImageNet classification within the framework of Noisy Student [1]. The top-1 and top-5 accuracy are measured on the 200 classes that ImageNet-A includes. It extends the idea of self-training and distillation with the use of equal-or-larger student models and noise added to the student during learning. On robustness test sets, it improves ImageNet-A top-1 accuracy from 61.0% to 83.7%, reduces ImageNet-C mean corruption error from 45.7 to 28.3, and reduces ImageNet-P mean flip rate from 27.8 to 12.2. Our experiments showed that self-training with Noisy Student and EfficientNet can achieve an accuracy of 87.4% which is 1.9% higher than without Noisy Student. However, during the learning of the student, we inject noise such as dropout, stochastic depth and data augmentation via RandAugment to the student so that the student generalizes better than the teacher. We use EfficientNets[69] as our baseline models because they provide better capacity for more data. Qizhe Xie, Eduard Hovy, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le. A tag already exists with the provided branch name. For instance, on ImageNet-1k, Layer Grafted Pre-training yields 65.5% Top-1 accuracy in terms of 1% few-shot learning with ViT-B/16, which improves MIM and CL baselines by 14.4% and 2.1% with no bells and whistles. Using self-training with Noisy Student, together with 300M unlabeled images, we improve EfficientNets[69] ImageNet top-1 accuracy to 87.4%. During the generation of the pseudo labels, the teacher is not noised so that the pseudo labels are as accurate as possible. In other words, using Noisy Student makes a much larger impact to the accuracy than changing the architecture. To intuitively understand the significant improvements on the three robustness benchmarks, we show several images in Figure2 where the predictions of the standard model are incorrect and the predictions of the Noisy Student model are correct. This paper proposes to search for an architectural building block on a small dataset and then transfer the block to a larger dataset and introduces a new regularization technique called ScheduledDropPath that significantly improves generalization in the NASNet models. and surprising gains on robustness and adversarial benchmarks. It implements SemiSupervised Learning with Noise to create an Image Classification. Parthasarathi et al. labels, the teacher is not noised so that the pseudo labels are as good as 1ImageNetTeacher NetworkStudent Network 2T [JFT dataset] 3 [JFT dataset]ImageNetStudent Network 4Student Network1DropOut21 1S-TTSS equal-or-larger student model Self-training with noisy student improves imagenet classification, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer . 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), We present a simple self-training method that achieves 88.4% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, which is 2.0% better than the state-of-the-art model that requires 3.5B weakly labeled Instagram images. In the above experiments, iterative training was used to optimize the accuracy of EfficientNet-L2 but here we skip it as it is difficult to use iterative training for many experiments. A tag already exists with the provided branch name. These test sets are considered as robustness benchmarks because the test images are either much harder, for ImageNet-A, or the test images are different from the training images, for ImageNet-C and P. For ImageNet-C and ImageNet-P, we evaluate our models on two released versions with resolution 224x224 and 299x299 and resize images to the resolution EfficientNet is trained on. Unlike previous studies in semi-supervised learning that use in-domain unlabeled data (e.g, ., CIFAR-10 images as unlabeled data for a small CIFAR-10 training set), to improve ImageNet, we must use out-of-domain unlabeled data. For a small student model, using our best model Noisy Student (EfficientNet-L2) as the teacher model leads to more improvements than using the same model as the teacher, which shows that it is helpful to push the performance with our method when small models are needed for deployment. In contrast, the predictions of the model with Noisy Student remain quite stable. In other words, the student is forced to mimic a more powerful ensemble model. Notably, EfficientNet-B7 achieves an accuracy of 86.8%, which is 1.8% better than the supervised model. These CVPR 2020 papers are the Open Access versions, provided by the. We hypothesize that the improvement can be attributed to SGD, which introduces stochasticity into the training process. Use, Smithsonian While removing noise leads to a much lower training loss for labeled images, we observe that, for unlabeled images, removing noise leads to a smaller drop in training loss. Noisy Student Training achieves 88.4% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, which is 2.0% better than the state-of-the-art model that requires 3.5B weakly labeled Instagram images. student is forced to learn harder from the pseudo labels. IEEE Trans. We vary the model size from EfficientNet-B0 to EfficientNet-B7[69] and use the same model as both the teacher and the student. Our experiments showed that self-training with Noisy Student and EfficientNet can achieve an accuracy of 87.4% which is 1.9% higher than without Noisy Student. Finally, for classes that have less than 130K images, we duplicate some images at random so that each class can have 130K images. We first report the validation set accuracy on the ImageNet 2012 ILSVRC challenge prediction task as commonly done in literature[35, 66, 23, 69] (see also [55]). Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classification Original paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.04252.pdf Authors: Qizhe Xie, Eduard Hovy, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le HOYA012 Introduction EfficientNet ImageNet SOTA EfficientNet We use stochastic depth[29], dropout[63] and RandAugment[14]. At the top-left image, the model without Noisy Student ignores the sea lions and mistakenly recognizes a buoy as a lighthouse, while the model with Noisy Student can recognize the sea lions. We investigate the importance of noising in two scenarios with different amounts of unlabeled data and different teacher model accuracies. The main difference between Data Distillation and our method is that we use the noise to weaken the student, which is the opposite of their approach of strengthening the teacher by ensembling. However, the additional hyperparameters introduced by the ramping up schedule and the entropy minimization make them more difficult to use at scale. EfficientNet with Noisy Student produces correct top-1 predictions (shown in. We obtain unlabeled images from the JFT dataset [26, 11], which has around 300M images. The method, named self-training with Noisy Student, also benefits from the large capacity of EfficientNet family. We then train a larger EfficientNet as a student model on the combination of labeled and pseudo labeled images. On . This accuracy is 1.0% better than the previous state-of-the-art ImageNet accuracy which requires 3.5B weakly labeled Instagram images. As we use soft targets, our work is also related to methods in Knowledge Distillation[7, 3, 26, 16]. We thank the Google Brain team, Zihang Dai, Jeff Dean, Hieu Pham, Colin Raffel, Ilya Sutskever and Mingxing Tan for insightful discussions, Cihang Xie for robustness evaluation, Guokun Lai, Jiquan Ngiam, Jiateng Xie and Adams Wei Yu for feedbacks on the draft, Yanping Huang and Sameer Kumar for improving TPU implementation, Ekin Dogus Cubuk and Barret Zoph for help with RandAugment, Yanan Bao, Zheyun Feng and Daiyi Peng for help with the JFT dataset, Olga Wichrowska and Ola Spyra for help with infrastructure. Classification of Socio-Political Event Data, SLADE: A Self-Training Framework For Distance Metric Learning, Self-Training with Differentiable Teacher, https://github.com/hendrycks/natural-adv-examples/blob/master/eval.py. These works constrain model predictions to be invariant to noise injected to the input, hidden states or model parameters. On ImageNet-C, it reduces mean corruption error (mCE) from 45.7 to 31.2. During the learning of the student, we inject noise such as dropout, stochastic depth, and data augmentation via RandAugment to the student so that the student generalizes better than the teacher. Imaging, 39 (11) (2020), pp. International Conference on Machine Learning, Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing, A. Roy Chowdhury, P. Chakrabarty, A. Singh, S. Jin, H. Jiang, L. Cao, and E. G. Learned-Miller, Automatic adaptation of object detectors to new domains using self-training, T. Salimans, I. Goodfellow, W. Zaremba, V. Cheung, A. Radford, and X. Chen, Probability of error of some adaptive pattern-recognition machines, W. Shi, Y. Gong, C. Ding, Z. MaXiaoyu Tao, and N. Zheng, Transductive semi-supervised deep learning using min-max features, C. Simon-Gabriel, Y. Ollivier, L. Bottou, B. Schlkopf, and D. Lopez-Paz, First-order adversarial vulnerability of neural networks and input dimension, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov, Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Not only our method improves standard ImageNet accuracy, it also improves classification robustness on much harder test sets by large margins: ImageNet-A[25] top-1 accuracy from 16.6% to 74.2%, ImageNet-C[24] mean corruption error (mCE) from 45.7 to 31.2 and ImageNet-P[24] mean flip rate (mFR) from 27.8 to 16.1.
Celebrities Who Live In Pigeon Forge,
Did Stegosaurus Have Feathers,
Vrchat Public Avatars,
Articles S